By Craig Kwasniewski
First off, I'm down with A.I. getting the starting nod in the All Star game. People were pointing out how flawed the whole voting system is, but come on, he deserved what was in essence a "career thumbs up" from the peeps. Is it really wrong to catch one of the most exciting players from the Aughts in a siganure event for one last time? Even if he's only scoring 14.3 points on a lottery bound team let the man play!
Even if David Stern didn't fix the Western Conference voting for Steve Nash (which he totally did), I'd be cool with T-Mac starting in Dallas too. This is the system the NBA has had in like forever and it should remain the same... regardless that a player like T-Mac is voted in despite playing a grand total of 46 minutes this season. (BTW - I'm cool with the fix, Nash is on his last legs as a significant player and with Sarver bent on selling off the entire Suns roster, this might be Nash's last chance at an All Star spot. And what better place than Dallas, where he really blossomed into the player he is.)
But why change a system that has worked all these years? What's wrong with a little controversy/discussion in the slow months of January and February? The NBA should embrace the controversy BCS-style. We all know the NCAA relishes the extra attention it deserves with all the "the BCS is flawed" talk. This makes college football a year-round water cooler topic. Most of us here are NBA lifers, do we really need any more talk about Gilbert Arenas, LeBron's summer, Kobe vs. LeBron or yet another month of trade talk? I mean really?!? Yeah, that's all we need is more weeks of ridiculous trade rumors by ADD fans on long lonely nights playing waaaaay too much with the ESPN trade machine using one hand to type...
It's a long season and the annual All-Star talk is an engaging topic, whether about players, coaches, events, locations... we all need the change of pace. Let's keep the voting as is and embrace the extra controversy.
And think about it, Magic Johnson's All Star MVP performance in 1992 would never have happened if the Association took the votes away from the people. After all, he didn't play a single solitary regular season game so he really didn't "deserve" the spot, did he? But it goes down as one of the best feel good stories in the history of the NBA.
Keep the system as is.

Finally a good, solid post! Agree with the points.
Posted by: PK | January 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM
Thanks... I think.
Posted by: Craig | January 27, 2010 at 07:53 PM
I'm ok with the fan vote, but they need to ditch the positions, or at least modify them.
Posted by: Scott | February 01, 2010 at 12:20 AM
Finally a good, solid post! Agree with the points.
Posted by: new laptop battery | October 21, 2010 at 06:39 PM
Maybe you want try it! www.mathfeats.com
Posted by: Brainetics Scam | May 13, 2011 at 02:03 AM
y a good, solid post! Agree with the points.
Posted by: color | June 17, 2011 at 10:52 PM
Genau die gleiche Gerichtssaal, die Jamie Leigh Jones 'Forderungen gegenüber der Frau Ex verweigert - Chef, in dem die Dame endete als mit Drogen vergewaltigt, bietet erhielt die Frau aufgeladen $ 145, 000 auf der ganzen Gerichtssaal Gebühren werden die folgenden wee, [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/]Ugg Online[/url] , e. Jones sagte, sie erschien etwa im Juli vergewaltigt Juli 2004 mit Bagdad während Ihres Geliebten eingesetzt hat in Bezug auf staatliche Auftragnehmer Kellogg Brown & Origin (KBR) und legte auch die passen in 2007. Über 6. Juli in dieser Saison, weigerte sich das Gericht der öffentlichen Meinung die Frau Anspruch gegen KBR und auch Mitarbeiter Charles Boartz, in denen die Dame endete als zusammen mit vergewaltigt durch viele KBR Feuerwehrleute unter Drogen gesetzt. Bestimmen Keith Ellison auf der OUGHOUT. UTES. Region im Gerichtssaal in Houston gegeben KBR Anwälte $ 145, 000 in den Gerichtssaal Gebühren für Ihre Tryout, viel weniger Ansatz $ 2.000 KBR Anwälte in Ladungen in der gut mit zuletzt 30 Tage Zeit benötigt, gab bekannt, dass Houston Share., [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/jimmy-choo-ugg-wholesale-1.html]Jimmy Choo UGG[/url] " Denn das KBR Angeklagten Gebühren in erzielbaren Aufwendungen im Zusammenhang mit [Satzung] aufgezählt slip, dass der Gerichtssaal fest, dass KBR ist die praktische Anwendung in Bezug auf die Ausgaben gewährt werden sollte, "Ellison erwähnt.
Posted by: Ugg Online | October 05, 2011 at 08:28 PM
Thank you for sharing. I completely agree with you. I really like this article. It contains a lot of useful information.
Posted by: Oil Paintings for sale | December 21, 2011 at 11:50 PM